Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for May, 2008

5/18/08 – The Choosing of the Twelve – Shane continues his lessons through the Book of Mark. This lesson covers Mark 3:13-19 and the Choosing of the Twelve apostles. Here’s Shane’s outline of the study:

OT Background

  • “Up on the Mountain” – 3:13
  • “He appointed twelve” – 3:14

The Role of the Apostles

  • “Whom he also named apostles” – 3:14
  • “That they might be with him” – 3:14
  • “Send them out to preach” – 3:14
  • “And have authority to cast out demons” – 3:15

The Men Themselves

  • Every list begins with Peter
  • Possibly three sets of brothers
  • All were apparently from Galilee (except Judas)
  • Every list ends with Judas

Some Lessons for Us

  • Christ can work through Imperfect people
  • Christ can unite very different people
  • Christ sees us as we are and as what we can be

If you have questions or comments please feel free to leave a reply.

Read Full Post »

5/11/08 – God’s Special Providence – Lesson 5 in the series on God’s Providence by Shane Scott. After listening let Shane know what you think by leaving a reply.

Read Full Post »

What Shall We Do? is lesson 3 in Shane Scott’s in-depth study of the first century church that was established on the Day of Pentecost. After listening please be sure to let us know what you think.

Read Full Post »

Peter’s Sermon on the Day of Pentecost– This is the second lesson in this series by Shane Scott. After listening please feel free to leave a comment.

Read Full Post »

Pentecost: The Turning Point of the New Testament – This is the first lesson in this series by Shane Scott. After listening please feel free to leave a comment.

Read Full Post »

Lesson 5 in Shane Scott’s series on The Da Vinci Code taught at the Woodland Hills church in 2006 is entitled: Does the Bible Degrade Women?

Read Full Post »

Philosophers refer to our present era of intellectual history as the postmodern period. This means that we are beyond the modern period when the scientific method ruled. As hostile to Christianity as scientific modernism is, there is one crucial area in which both Christians and modernists agree. Both agree that absolute truth exists, though each has a profoundly different basis for grasping truth.

Postmodernism, however, denies that objective truth exists. Truth is only what you perceive it to be, and what is true for you may not be true for someone else. This viewpoint is called relativism.

I used to tell my students that I was not a postmodern professor, because I gave them grades based on the objective standard of my expectations. A consistent postmodern professor would have no choice but to give every student an “A,” since every student can say his “wrong” answers were true, from his point of view.

As silly as that prospect is, the bitter consequence of relativism is that all ethical systems and philosophical worldviews must also receive the same passing grade. If there is no eternal standard by which behavior and ideas can be judged, then all behaviors and all ideas must be equally regarded.

Despite its moniker, postmodernism is hardly a recent development. From the standpoint of Scripture, mankind has always been tempted to replace God’s objective will with his own self-will. I want to explore what the Bible says about this dangerous course.

The Paradigm-Romans 1
In Romans 1-3 Paul presents his indictment against sinful humanity, concluding that “all have sinned” (Rom. 3:23). Both Jews and Gentiles are guilty of violating whatever law God has given them. Romans 1:18-32 is Paul’s description of the utter sinfulness of the Gentile world. In this passage, I want you to notice two things. First, the root cause for this apostasy, and second, the consequences this had for Gentile society.

The Cause-Rejection of God
Romans 1:18 declares that God’s wrath is revealed against those who suppress the truth. What truth? “That which is known about God” (1:19). In particular, Paul argues that the Gentiles could know God’s eternal power and divine nature based on “the creation of the world” (1:20). The Gentiles were given clear proof of God’s existence and power though nature, but they suppressed this truth.

Man needs to believe in something. And what Paul goes on to say is that upon rejecting belief on God, the Gentiles invented their own religion. This religion denied God’s distinct role as Creator, and instead crafted gods in the image of creation, including man (1:21). This is mankind’s story. When we reject God in Whose image we are made, we replace Him with a god man in our own image. This is the essence of relativism-creating your own religion.

The Consequences
Next, in Romans 1:24-32, Paul outlines three severe ramifications of rejection of God, keying each with the phrase “God gave them over” (1:24, 26, 28). Far more consequential than man giving up God is God giving up man.

First, God gave the Gentiles “over in the lusts of their hearts” (1:24). Pagan religion was saturated with sexual overtones, complete with temple prostitution (see Gen. 38:21). It is no wonder that rejection of the true God led to promiscuity.

Second, “God gave them over to degrading passions” (1:26), defined here by Paul as homosexual and lesbian conduct. God built within His creation the ability to reproduce. Rejection of God as Creator would naturally lead to sexual abominations which fundamentally deny the life-giving reproduction inherent in God’s created order.

Third, “God gave them over to a depraved mind” (1:28). Paul’s description of the depraved mind is that it causes complete social chaos (1:29-31), or what we might call “man’s inhumanity to man.”

When mankind calls its own shots, the results are profligacy, perversion, and savagery.

A Historical Example
Not only does Scripture outline the evils of relativism, it also illustrates them. Let’s now take a look at a period of Israel’s history when “there was no king in Israel; everyone did what was right in his own eyes” (Judges 21:25)-the period of the Judges.

The Root Cause
The period of the Judges is that time in Israel’s history sandwiched in between the exodus and the monarchy. Though Israel had a king on the throne, God Himself, the nation had no visible national leader. Judges 17 opens with a story about a young boy who confesses to his mother that he stole her silver. She responds by blessing him, and then vows, “I wholly dedicate the silver from my hand to the LORD for my son to make a graven image and a molten image” (17:3). Israel has rejected the true knowledge of God.

The Consequences
On the basis of Romans 1 we can anticipate what will happen next. First, the record speaks of a Levite’s concubine who “played the harlot against him” (19:2). This is what Paul spoke of when he said God gives the godless over to the “lusts of their heart.”

After tracking her down, the Levite passes through the region of Benjamin on his way home. At the town of Gibeah he finds lodging with an old man in the city. That night a mob from the city surrounded the house and demanded that the Levite be sent out so that they could abuse him sexually (19:22). This is the “degrading passion” Paul spoke of.

Desperate, the Levite sent out his concubine to the mob, and she was abused until she dropped dead at the door. The Levite then sent word to all the tribes about this disgrace. When the tribes demand that the men of Benjamin punish Gibeah, they refuse. Gibeah has found “hearty approval” in the eyes of Benjamin, as Paul said of the Gentiles (Rom. 1:32).

A civil war ensues in which the 11 tribes make war on Benjamin-social chaos at its worst. Of the 26,000 men of Benjamin who fought, only 600 survived (20:47).

Application
I don’t think there is any question that our society is in the process of giving up God. Relativism abounds in our country, with no more vivid example than President Clinton. In his testimony during his scandal with Monica Lewinsky, the president repeatedly redefined terms like “sexual relations,” “alone,” and even “is” in a way that defied objective reality. The overwhelming public support he received can only mean that our society gives its own “hearty approval” to evil doers.

Further, I don’t think there is any question that God is in the process of giving this nation up. The “sexual revolution” has truly rebelled against the purity of sex in marriage that God’s word ordains (Heb. 13:4). The acceptance of homosexual conduct is growing, and in some cases with tacit civil approval. And who would deny that our culture is coarsening, hardening in its inhumanity?

Relativism may sound like an esoteric philosophy, but its application is fatal to society. Our responsibility as Christians is to demonstrate consistent obedience to the truth of God’s word, and to share the news of the One who is “the way, the truth, and the life” to the world (John 14:6).

Read Full Post »

This is the third lesson in the series preached on May 4, 2008. In this lesson Shane defines Miracles and helps us understand the part they have to play in God’s providence. Click here for the link: Miracles

Read Full Post »

The reign of King Josiah is a model of restorationism. When the book of the law was discovered by Josiah’s workers, even though the law was written centuries earlier, it was possible to clear away the countless departures from God’s will and establish faithful service in Josiah’s day. In the same way, it is possible for us to conform our faith and practice to the apostolic standards revealed in the first century. This is the essence of what it means to be a restorationist.

 

However, this is challenging work. There have been many “restoration movements” in religious history, with varying degrees of success. What mistakes must we avoid if we are to succeed?

 

Mistake One: Focusing Only on Externals
Sometimes the goal of restoration is said to be “restoring the New Testament church.” What is meant by this is aligning our work, organization, and worship in the local church with the New Testament pattern. As I explained in the first article in this series, that is a worthwhile, and indeed an essential goal.

 

However, the New Testament teaches far more about the way in which individual Christians should behave than it does how the local church is to operate. The inner aspect of Christianity is especially emphasized, “faith working through love” (Galatians 5:6). It is easy to focus on a few basic collective works of the local church, or a few basic obligations of individual Christians, and check them in comparison to Scripture. But what about the work of restoring attitudes?

 

The Pharisees were deeply committed to the notion of purity under the Law. But their commendable desire gave way to hypocritical focus on things like washing hands and tithing spices, while neglecting the “weightier provisions of the law: justice and mercy and faithfulness; but these are the things you should have done without neglecting the others” (Matthew 23:23).

 

I have read articles in which brethren disparage emphasis on love as somehow being equivalent to doctrinal softness. Love is a Bible doctrine! And lack of love is every bit as much a doctrinal error as is infant baptism. Just as the local church has marks of identification, so do individual disciples, and love is chief among them. “By this all men will know that you are My disciples, if you have love for one another” (John 13:35).

 

By neglecting the restoration of inward virtues, we are setting ourselves up for spiritual failure and hypocrisy. What a shame it is for members to know the plan of salvation but gossip and backbite; or for preachers to be able to dissect arguments for the rapture but live in immorality. God’s will commands complete personal commitment, and that should be the extent of restoration.

 

Mistake Two: Pride
The Bible teaches that knowledge can cause conceit (1 Corinthians 8:1). Since restoration depends on knowledge of the Scriptures, there is therefore an inherent danger of arrogance. After all, our society knows less about the Bible now than probably any era in American history. It doesn’t take much to know more about the Bible than your neighbors and co-workers. For this reason we must guard against arrogance toward others, and prideful stubbornness to change when we see we are wrong.

 

Many of the Pharisees and scribes relished their position as experts on the Law. But this knowledge actually worked against them because of conceit. “The officers then came to the chief priests and Pharisees, and they said to them, ‘Why did you not bring Him?’ The officers answered, ‘Never has a man spoken the way this man speaks.’ The Pharisees then answered them, ‘You have not also been led astray, have you? Not one of the rulers or Pharisees has believed in Him, has he? But this crowd which does not know the Law is accursed’ ” (John 7:45–49).

 

Just because we may know more about the Bible than someone else, or come closer to God’s standards of conduct than others, this offers us no reason for pride. Jesus told the story of the haughty Pharisee and humble publican for this very reason (Luke 18:9-14). And besides, we will stand or fall before the Lord based on how we stack up to His word, not how we compare to others. “Humble yourselves in the presence of the Lord, and He will exalt you” (James 4:10).

 

Mistake Three: Concluding That the Restoration Is Over
As I said earlier, there have been many restoration movements in history. In the Middle Ages many believers were outraged by the follies of the Catholic Church. The result of this was the Reformation, in which many unscriptural practices of Catholicism were rightly jettisoned. Ironically, after chaffing under the authority and tradition of the Catholic hierarchy, these reformers and their followers codified the fruits of their study into creeds and confessions they bound on others. Creedalism is the inevitable result of closing the door on restorationism.

 

Any time we get to the point where we decide that the restoration is over, we are doomed. In the first place, to claim that is to claim that I am perfect, and that is far from the case. In the second place, to allege that the restoration is over is to claim that every spiritual virtue and attitude in my life is at the level it should be, which means there is no longer room for growth. And in the third place, if I claim that the restoration is over, then I am arguing that there is no need for further study or investigation, robbing future generations of their divine command to examine everything (1 Thessalonians 5:21).

 

Some people see the restoration as a completed task, with the results proudly on display as in a museum. The results can be viewed, but there is a velvet rope which prohibits closer examination and further investigation. I prefer to see the restoration as on ongoing exploration, the complete fulfillment of which we will never realize, but the pursuit of which will make us holier for the doing.

 

“Not that I have already obtained it or have already become perfect, but I press on so that I may lay hold of that for which also I was laid hold of by Christ Jesus. Brethren, I do not regard myself as having laid hold of it yet; but one thing I do: forgetting what lies behind and reaching forward to what lies ahead, I press on toward the goal for the prize of the upward call of God in Christ Jesus. Let us therefore, as many as are perfect, have this attitude” (Philippians 3:12–15a).

 

 

Read Full Post »

Lesson 4 in Shane Scott’s series on The Da Vinci Code taught at the Woodland Hills church in 2006 is entitled: Was Jesus Just a Man?

Read Full Post »

Older Posts »